Definition of travelling
It is also permissible to miss a fast whilst
one is travelling. Keep the distance of journey in mind. According to the
research of Imām-e-Ahl-e-Sunnat A'lā Ḥaḍrat Maulānā Shāh Aḥmad Razā K͟hān رَحْمَةُ اللّٰه عَلَيْه 'By Sharī'ah, the
distance of a journey is 57½ miles (almost 92km). Therefore, whoever leaves the
vicinity of his city or village with the intention of travelling for the above-mentioned distance will be regarded a traveller. By Sharī'ah, he can miss fast
and make up for it later and he has to offer Ṣalāh (with 'Qaṣr'). A traveller
can fast, but he will have to reduce his four Rak'āt Ṣalāh to two Rak'āt (it is
Wājib for him to do so), not doing this is a sin. If someone is unaware of this
ruling and offers four Rak'āt, he is Wājib for him to offer two Rak'āt with the
intention of Qaṣr. (Derived from Fatāwā Razawiyyah referenced, pp.
270, vol. 8)Therefore, all such four Rak'āt-Ṣalāh
offered without Qaṣr (reduction) during the journey due to ignorance will have
to be repeated with two Rak'āt with the intention of 'Qaṣr' (calculate all such
Ṣalāh and offer them). However, a traveller will have to offer four Rak'āt if
he offers his Ṣalāh following a resident (non traveller) Imām. There is no need
to repeat Sunnah and Witr. The ruling of 'Qaṣr' only applies to the Farḍ Rak'āt
of Ẓuhr, 'Aṣr and 'Ishā: two Rak'āt will be offered instead of four. The Sunnah
and Witr Ṣalāh will be offered as usual without any reduction.
After reaching the destination, if
there is the intention to stay over there for a period of less than 15 days he
will remain a traveller and the ruling that applies to a traveller will apply
to him. However, if he intends to stay there for 15 days or more than 15 days
the ruling of a traveller will no longer apply to him and he will be regarded a
resident ('Muqīm') therefore he will have to fast and offer Ṣalāh completely.
To learn the detailed rulings
regarding 'travelling' please refer to Bahār-e-Sharī'at, part 4: Chapter
of a Traveller.
Slight
illness is not a valid exemption
If someone is severely ill and there
is a high probability that his illness will prolong or recovery will be delayed
as a result of fasting, he is allowed to miss his fast in this case (further
details to follow).
Unfortunately, it is observed these
days that people miss fasts or, Allah عَزَّوَجَلَّ
forbid, even break fasts having started them due to minor cold, fever and
headaches. One should never do so. If someone misses a single fast without a
valid exemption, he will not be able to regain its blessings even if he spends
the rest of his life fasting.
Dear Islamic brothers! Three blessed
Ahadis are presented before we look at the detailed rulings about the
exemptions for missing fasts.
One has a choice to fast or not in journey
- Mother of the believers, Sayyidatunā 'Āishah Ṣiddīqah رَضِیَ اللّٰهُ عَنْهَا has said that
Sayyidunā Ḥamzah Bin 'Amr Aslamī رَضِیَ اللّٰهُ
عَنْهُ used to fast in abundance. He asked the Beloved and
Blessed Prophet صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَاٰلِهٖ
وَسَلَّم 'Shall I fast during journey?' He صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَاٰلِهٖ وَسَلَّم replied, 'You
have the choice whether to fast or not.' (Ṣaḥīḥ Bukhārī, pp. 640,
vol. 1, Hadis 1943)
- Sayyidunā Abū Sa'id K͟hudrī رَضِیَ
اللّٰهُ عَنْهُ has said, 'We set out for Jihad with
the Holy Prophet صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَاٰلِهٖ
وَسَلَّم on the 16th of Ramadan; some of us fasted whereas some
didn't. Those who fasted didn't object to those who didn't fast and vice
versa.' (Sahih Muslim, pp. 564, Hadis 1116)
- Sayyidunā Anas Bin Mālik Ka'bī رَضِیَ اللّٰهُ عَنْهُ has narrated that the Beloved and Blessed
Prophet صَلَّى اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَاٰلِهٖ وَسَلَّم
has said, 'Allah عَزَّوَجَلَّ
has reduced the Ṣalāh of a traveller by half (the 4 Rak'āt Ṣalāh will be
offered as 2 Rak'āt) and exempted travellers and breast feeding and
pregnant women from fasting (they are allowed to miss their fasts and make
up for them later).' (Jāmi' Tirmiżī, pp. 170, vol. 2, Hadīš 715)
33
Points about exemptions for not having fast
[Remember that one will have to keep
Qaḍā fast for every missed fast after relief from the compulsion].
- A traveller has the choice whether to fast or not. (Rad-dul-Muḥtār,
pp. 403, vol. 3)
- If a traveller and his companion do not suffer any harm
in case of fasting, it is preferable to fast during the journey, but if
either of them or both will be suffering harm then it is better not to
fast. (Durr-e-Mukhtār, pp. 405, vol. 3)
- If a traveller becomes a resident (as per the Sharʻī
definition of resident) before Ḍahwā Kubrā (The definition of Ḍahwā Kubrā
(Sharʻī Midday) has already been mentioned in the section of intention of
fast.) (Sharʻī midday) and he hasn't yet eaten or drunk anything, it is
Wājib for him to make the intention of fast. (Al-Jauhara-tun-Nayyarah,
pp. 186, vol. 1) Let's say, for instance, that someone lives in the famous
Pakistani city Hyderabad, he leaves Bāb-ul-Madīnah Karachi to head for
Hyderabad and arrives there at 10 a.m. If he has not eaten anything since
dawn during the journey, it is Wājib for him to make the intention of
fast.
- If somebody sets out a journey at daytime, he cannot break
that day's fast because of that journey. However, if he broke the fast
during the journey he would not be required to pay expiation for it but
doing so is a sin. (Rad-dul-Muḥtār, pp. 416, vol. 3) It is Farḍ to
make up for this fast.
- If somebody breaks fast before he sets out his journey
and then he begins his journey, expiation will be mandatory for him
(provided that the conditions for expiation are met). (ibid)
- If somebody begins journey during the daytime (and did
not break fast during the journey) but then returned home to take
something which he had left at home forgetfully and broke fast, expiation
will be Wājib (provided that the conditions of expiation are met). If he
had broken it during the journey, only making up for it by fasting another
day would have been Farḍ as stated in point number 4. (Fatāwā 'Ālamgīrī,
pp. 207, vol. 1)
- If somebody is forced to break fast he can do so, but
he will be rewarded if he takes patience. (The definition of 'Ikrāh (being
forced)' has already been explained on page 120). (Rad-dul-Muḥtār,
pp. 402, vol. 3)
- If the life of a fasting person is in danger as a
result of being stung by a snake, he should break the fast. (Rad-dul-Muḥtār,
pp. 402, vol. 3)
- If anyone breaks his fast due to any of the
aforementioned reasons, it is Farḍ for him to make up for it by fasting
another day. Maintaining the order in these missed fasts is not Farḍ.
Therefore, if he kept Nafl fasts before keeping his Qaḍā fasts, the ruling
is that the Nafl fasts will still be valid.
However, once he is relieved of the
compulsion for missing fasts, he must keep his Qaḍā fasts before the arrival of
the next Ramadan. A Hadīš states, 'If anyone has to keep previous Ramadan's
fasts as Qaḍā, but he doesn't do, his fasts of the current Ramadan will not be
accepted.' (Majma'-uz-Zawāid, pp. 415, vol. 3)
No comments:
Post a Comment